| Reaction | Reagent | Mechanism | Key Features & Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleophilic sub. (OH⁻) | NaOH (aq) | SN2 (1°, 2°) / SN1 (3°) | R–X → R–OH; inversion (SN2); racemisation (SN1) |
| Nucleophilic sub. (CN⁻) | KCN / DMSO | SN2 | R–X → R–CN (nitrile); chain lengthened by 1C; C-end of CN attacks |
| Nucleophilic sub. (NC⁻) | AgCN | SN2 (via tight Ag ion pair) | R–X → R–NC (isocyanide); N-end attacks when Ag⁺ coordinates C |
| Nucleophilic sub. (RO⁻) | NaOR (Williamson) | SN2 | R–X + R'O⁻ → R–O–R' (ether); 1° halide preferred; 3° gives E2 |
| Nucleophilic sub. (N₃⁻) | NaN₃ / DMSO | SN2 | R–X → R–N₃ (azide); reduction → R–NH₂ |
| Nucleophilic sub. (I⁻) | NaI / acetone | SN2 (Finkelstein) | R–Cl / R–Br → R–I; NaCl/NaBr precipitate; drives equilibrium |
| Nucleophilic sub. (RS⁻) | NaSR | SN2 | R–X → R–SR' (thioether); S excellent soft nucleophile |
| Nucleophilic sub. (R₃P) | PPh₃ | SN2 | R–X → R–PPh₃⁺ X⁻ (phosphonium salt); used in Wittig |
| Nucleophilic sub. (RCO₂⁻) | RCOO⁻Na⁺ | SN2 | R–X → R–OOCR' (ester); inversion; 1° preferred |
| Elimination (E2) | KOH / EtOH / heat | E2 | Anti-periplanar H–C–C–X; Zaitsev product; no rearrangement |
| Elimination (Hofmann) | KOt-Bu / t-BuOH | E2 (Hofmann) | Bulky base → less substituted alkene; terminal alkene preferred |
| Grignard prep. | Mg / dry ether | Radical mechanism (surface) | R–X + Mg → RMgX; very strong base/nucleophile; strictly anhydrous |
| Organolithium prep. | 2Li / ether | Ionic | R–X + 2Li → RLi + LiX; even stronger base than Grignard; anhydrous |
| Reduction (LiAlH₄) | LiAlH₄ / dry ether | SN2 (H⁻ delivery) | R–X → R–H; H⁻ as nucleophile; inversion at C; 1° > 2° > 3° |
| Reduction (Zn/HCl) | Zn / HCl | Radical / ionic | R–X → R–H; vicinal dihalide → alkene (β-elimination by Zn) |
| Coupling (Ullmann) | Cu / heat | Radical | 2 ArX → Ar–Ar (biaryl); copper couples two aryl halides |
| Corey–House synthesis | R₂CuLi + R'X | SN2 | R–R' formed; soft cuprate attacks soft alkyl halide; no E2 |
| Nucleophilic sub. (NO₂⁻) | AgNO₂ | SN2 (tight pair → O-attack) | R–X → R–ONO (nitrite ester); KNO₂ → R–NO₂ (nitroalkane, C-attack) |
| α-Elimination (E1cb) | KOt-Bu / CHCl₃ | E1cb (α-elim.) | CHCl₃ → :CCl₂ (carbene); carbanion loses Cl⁻ from same carbon |
| Wurtz reaction | Na / dry ether | Radical | 2 R–X + 2Na → R–R + 2NaX; symmetrical alkane; 1° halides best |
| Reaction | Substrate | Product | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| With formaldehyde (HCHO) | RMgX + HCHO | Primary alcohol (R–CH₂OH) | Chain +1C; simplest carbonyl; gives 1° alcohol after H₃O⁺ |
| With RCHO (aldehyde) | RMgX + R'CHO | Secondary alcohol R–CH(OH)–R' | Chain +1C at aldehyde C; 2° alcohol |
| With R₂CO (ketone) | RMgX + R'COR'' | Tertiary alcohol | 3° alcohol; both R groups from ketone retained |
| With CO₂ | RMgX + CO₂ → hydrolysis | Carboxylic acid RCOOH | Chain +1C as –COOH; excellent synthetic route to acid |
| With ester (RCOOR') | 2 RMgX + ester | 3° alcohol (two R groups same) | Two equivalents add; ketone intermediate reacts again; 3° alcohol |
| With nitrile (RCN) | R'MgX + RCN → hydrolysis | Ketone R–CO–R' | Imine salt intermediate; hydrolysis gives ketone |
| With epoxide | RMgX + epoxide | Primary alcohol (longer chain) | SN2 at less hindered C of epoxide; ring opens; gives 1° alcohol |
| With H₂O / ROH | RMgX + H₂O or ROH | R–H (alkane) | Protonolysis; destroys Grignard; any acidic H reacts; diagnostic |
| With terminal alkyne RC≡CH | RMgX + HC≡CR' | R–H + R'C≡CMgX (new Grignard) | pKa(alkyne)~25 < pKa(RH)~50; alkynyl Grignard formed |
| With acyl chloride (RCOCl) | RMgX + RCOCl | Ketone R–CO–R' (or 3° alcohol) | Ketone forms; if excess Grignard, ketone reacts further → 3° alcohol |
| With ethylene oxide | RMgX + ethylene oxide | Primary alcohol (chain +2C) | Opens at less hindered C (SN2); gives –CH₂CH₂OH extension |
| With alkyl halide (coupling) | RMgX + R'X (Corey-House via CuI) | R–R' (alkane coupling) | Direct coupling needs Cu catalysis; Grignard alone gives poor yield |
| Reaction | Reagent | Mechanism | Key Features & Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| With Na (active metal) | Na, K | Acid-base | 2ROH + 2Na → 2RONa + H₂↑; rate: 1° > 2° > 3°; alkoxide formed |
| With HX (Lucas) | HX (HI, HBr, HCl + ZnCl₂) | SN1 (3°, 2°) / SN2 (1°) | R–OH → R–X; rate: 3° > 2° > 1° (Lucas test); ZnCl₂ activates OH |
| With SOCl₂ | SOCl₂ (no base) | SNi (retention) | R–OH → R–Cl + SO₂ + HCl; retention at chiral C (cyclic TS) |
| With SOCl₂ + pyridine | SOCl₂ / pyridine | SN2 (inversion) | Pyridine drives backside attack on chlorosulfite; inversion |
| With PCl₅ | PCl₅ | SN2 | R–OH → R–Cl; inversion; vigorous conditions; HCl evolved |
| With PBr₃ | PBr₃ | SN2 | 3 ROH + PBr₃ → 3 RBr + H₃PO₃; inversion; 1° and 2° good |
| Dehydration (intramolecular) | Conc. H₂SO₄ / 170°C | E1 | R–OH → alkene + H₂O; 3° easiest; Zaitsev product; rearrangement possible |
| Dehydration (intermolecular) | Conc. H₂SO₄ / 140°C (1°) | SN2 | 2 ROH → R–O–R + H₂O (symmetric ether); 1° alcohols only |
| Fischer esterification | RCOOH + H⁺ (cat.) | Nucleophilic acyl sub. | R'OH attacks C=O of acid; tetrahedral intermediate; H₂O lost; equilibrium |
| Oxidation (KMnO₄ / K₂Cr₂O₇) | K₂Cr₂O₇ / H₂SO₄ | Oxidative (α-H removed) | 1° → RCOOH; 2° → R₂CO; 3° → no reaction; Cr⁶⁺ → Cr³⁺ (colour change) |
| Oxidation (PCC) | PCC (pyridinium chlorochromate) | Oxidative | 1° → RCHO (stops at aldehyde); 2° → R₂CO; 3° → no reaction |
| Oxidation (Swern) | (COCl)₂ / DMSO / Et₃N | Oxidative via sulfonium | 1° → RCHO only (no over-oxidation); mild; anhydrous; low T |
| With acetic anhydride | Ac₂O (+ base) | Nucleophilic acyl sub. | R–OH → R–OAc (acetate ester); base (pyridine) promotes; no acid needed |
| With TsCl (tosylation) | TsCl / pyridine | SN2 at S | R–OH → R–OTs; O–H bond broken; configuration retained at C; OTs = super-LG |
| Pinacol coupling | Mg / Hg or Ti(0) | Radical / reductive coupling | 2 R₂C=O → R₂C(OH)–C(OH)R₂ (pinacol); intermolecular; 1,2-diol |
| Reaction with Grignard | R'MgX + ROH | Acid-base (protonolysis) | R'MgX + ROH → R'H + ROMgX; destroys Grignard; ROH too acidic |
| Deprotonation (strong base) | NaH, NaNH₂ | Acid-base | ROH + NaH → RO⁻Na⁺ + H₂↑; makes alkoxide for Williamson synthesis |
| Oxidation (Oppenauer) | Al(OiPr)₃ + ketone | Transfer hydrogenation (concerted 6-membered TS) | 2° alcohol → ketone; MPV reverse; selective; no strong oxidant |
| Mitsunobu reaction | PPh₃ + DIAD + RCO₂H | SN2 (inversion) | ROH → RO₂CR' with inversion; converts poor LG OH to reactive species |
| Boron esterification | B(OR)₃ / RCOOH | Lewis acid-base | ROH + boric acid → borate ester; diol detection (cis-diol preferential) |
| Reaction | Reagent | Mechanism | Key Features & Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Williamson synthesis | R–O⁻ + R'X (1°) | SN2 | R–O–R' (unsymmetrical ether); 1° halide only; 3° gives E2; inversion at R' |
| Cleavage with HI (1:1) | HI (1 equiv) | SN2 (1°) / SN1 (3°) | R–O–R' + HI → R–OH + R'–I; I⁻ attacks less hindered or 3° carbon |
| Cleavage with HI (excess) | HI (excess) | SN2 then SN2 | R–O–R' + 2HI → R–I + R'–I + H₂O; both groups become iodides |
| Cleavage of aryl ether (PhOR) | HI or HBr | SN2 at alkyl C only | Ph–O–R + HI → PhOH + R–I; Ar–O bond NOT cleaved (no SN2 at sp²C); phenol formed |
| Autoxidation (air, light) | O₂ / hν | Radical chain | Et₂O + O₂ → diethyl ether peroxide (explosive); α-C–H weakest; hazard |
| Lewis acid coordination | BF₃, AlCl₃, RMgX | Lewis acid-base | Et₂O: O coordinates to Lewis acid; ether = ligand; stabilises Grignard |
| Cleavage by AlBr₃ / HBr | AlBr₃ (Lewis acid) | SN2 (activated by Al coordination to O) | R–O–R' + AlBr₃ + HBr → 2 RBr; Al activates C–O bond toward SN2 |
| Epoxide + H₂O (acid) | H₃O⁺ / H₂O | SN1-like at more substituted C | Acid: protonation → attack at more substituted C (carbocation character) → trans-diol |
| Epoxide + H₂O (base) | NaOH / H₂O | SN2 at less hindered C | Base: OH⁻ attacks less hindered C (SN2) → trans-diol; inversion at attacked C |
| Epoxide + RMgX | RMgX / dry ether | SN2 at less hindered C | Ring opens at less hindered C; gives primary alcohol (chain +2C via ethylene oxide) |
| Epoxide + LiAlH₄ | LiAlH₄ / ether | SN2 at less hindered C | H⁻ attacks less hindered C; inversion; gives less substituted alcohol |
| Epoxide + HBr / HI (acid) | HBr or HI | SN1 (3°) or SN2 (1°) | Protonation → Nu attacks more substituted C (SN1-like); Markovnikov-type opening |
| Epoxide + amine (RNH₂) | RNH₂ (Nu) | SN2 at less hindered C | β-amino alcohol formed; N attacks less hindered C; no acid needed for amines |
| Cyclic ether (THF) + RLi | n-BuLi (strong base) | Ring-opening elimination | THF cleaved by very strong organolithium at high T; forms alkoxide + alkene |
| Ziegler-Natta: epoxide in synthesis | Sharpless epoxidation | Concerted (Ti-mediated) | Allylic alcohol + Ti(OiPr)₄ + DIPT + t-BuOOH → enantioselective epoxide |
PhCH₂MgBr + ethylene oxide → (after H₃O⁺) gives:
(A) PhCH₂OH (phenylmethanol)
(B) PhCH₂CH₂CH₂OH (3-phenylpropan-1-ol; primary alcohol, chain +2C)
(C) PhCH₂CH₂OH (2-phenylethanol; primary; chain +2C) ✓
(D) PhCHO (benzaldehyde by oxidation)
SOCl₂ in pyridine converts (R)-2-butanol to 2-chlorobutane with:
(A) Retention of configuration (R)-product (SNi)
(B) Inversion to (S)-2-chlorobutane (SN2 via chlorosulfite; pyridine drives backside attack)
(C) Racemisation (SN1 through carbocation)
(D) Elimination to but-2-ene (E2)
Acid-catalysed opening of 1,2-epoxypropane (propylene oxide) with H₂O gives predominantly:
(A) Propan-1-ol (1-hydroxypropane)
(B) Propan-1,2-diol with OH at C2 (more substituted) → propylene glycol; nucleophile attacks at C2 (more carbocation character)
(C) Propan-1,3-diol (1,3-propanediol)
(D) Propanal by rearrangement
RMgX + CO₂ → (H₃O⁺) gives:
(A) R–OH (alcohol)
(B) RCHO (aldehyde)
(C) RCOOH (carboxylic acid; one carbon added as –COOH)
(D) R–R (coupling)
PhO⁻Na⁺ + (CH₃)₃CBr → ? (Williamson synthesis attempt)
(A) PhO–C(CH₃)₃ (t-butyl phenyl ether)
(B) Mainly isobutylene (2-methylpropene) + PhOH (E2 with PhO⁻ acting as base; 3° halide always gives E2 in Williamson)
(C) SN2 product (Ph–O–C(CH₃)₃) via inversion
(D) No reaction; PhO⁻ cannot act as base
PCC oxidation of 1-hexanol gives:
(A) Hexanedioic acid (adipic acid)
(B) Hexanal (stops at aldehyde; PCC is mild; does not over-oxidise to acid)
(C) Hexanoic acid (full oxidation)
(D) 2-Hexanone (isomerisation)
PhOCH₂CH₃ (ethyl phenyl ether) + HI → ? The products are:
(A) PhI + CH₃CH₂OH (aryl C–O cleaved by SN2)
(B) PhOH + CH₃CH₂I (alkyl C–O cleaved; Ar–O bond NOT broken by SN2 at sp² C)
(C) Ph–I + CH₃CH₂OH + I₂
(D) PhOCH₂I + CH₃OH (rearrangement)
LiAlH₄ reduces R–Br to R–H by:
(A) SN1 — LiAlH₄ ionises R–Br first
(B) SN2 — H⁻ (hydride) from LiAlH₄ attacks carbon with inversion; Br⁻ departs
(C) Radical mechanism (Al radical transfers H•)
(D) E2 followed by hydrogenation
2 equivalents of CH₃MgBr + ethyl acetate (CH₃COOEt) → H₃O⁺ → ?
(A) Acetic acid + methane
(B) 2-Methyl-2-propanol (t-butanol) — two CH₃ groups add to ester; ketone intermediate reacts with second Grignard → 3° alcohol
(C) Methanol + acetaldehyde
(D) 3-Pentanol (wrong carbon count)
The Finkelstein reaction (R–Cl + NaI / acetone → R–I + NaCl↓) is driven by:
(A) I⁻ is a better nucleophile than Cl⁻ in polar aprotic solvents
(B) NaCl precipitates from acetone (insoluble); Le Chatelier principle drives equilibrium toward R–I; combined with I⁻ being softer nucleophile — both factors operate
(C) NaI is more soluble than NaCl in all solvents
(D) SN1 mechanism; I⁻ traps the carbocation faster
3° alcohol + Lucas reagent (ZnCl₂ / conc. HCl) → turbidity immediately. The mechanism is:
(A) SN2 — Cl⁻ displaces OH directly from 3° carbon
(B) SN1 — ZnCl₂ coordinates OH, assists ionisation → 3° carbocation → Cl⁻ attacks; R–Cl (insoluble in reagent) causes turbidity
(C) E2 — water is eliminated first then HCl adds
(D) Radical substitution
KMnO₄ (acidic, hot) oxidises a 2° alcohol. The product is:
(A) Primary alcohol
(B) Aldehyde
(C) Ketone (no α-H on C=O side; oxidation stops at ketone from 2°)
(D) Carboxylic acid (only from primary alcohol)
Which reagent converts a primary alcohol to an aldehyde WITHOUT over-oxidation to carboxylic acid?
(A) K₂Cr₂O₇ / H₂SO₄
(B) KMnO₄ / H₂SO₄
(C) PCC (pyridinium chlorochromate) in CH₂Cl₂
(D) MnO₂ is incorrect here; PCC is correct
The Williamson synthesis of t-butyl methyl ether is best performed using:
(A) CH₃OH + (CH₃)₃CBr / NaOH → mainly ether (SN2)
(B) (CH₃)₃CO⁻Na⁺ + CH₃Br / DMSO → t-Bu–O–CH₃ (SN2 on CH₃Br; avoid 3° halide which gives E2)
(C) CH₃O⁻Na⁺ + (CH₃)₃CCl → t-Bu–O–CH₃ (SN2 on 3° — incorrect; gives isobutylene)
(D) (CH₃)₃COH + CH₃OH / H₂SO₄ → direct etherification
Grignard reagent (RMgX) is destroyed by:
(A) Dry ether (solvent)
(B) Any compound with a proton more acidic than R–H (pKa < ~50): H₂O, ROH, RC≡CH, NH₃, carboxylic acids
(C) Only strong acids like HCl
(D) Ketones (react but do not destroy)
Base-catalysed opening of propylene oxide (1,2-epoxypropane) with NaOH gives predominantly:
(A) 1,2-Propanediol with OH at C2 (more substituted) — via SN1-like
(B) 1,2-Propanediol with OH at C1 (less substituted); OH⁻ attacks less hindered C1 (SN2); inversion at C1
(C) Propan-1-ol by total reduction
(D) Acetaldehyde by Meinwald rearrangement
Diethyl ether stored in a transparent bottle exposed to air and light for months is hazardous because:
(A) HCl forms from ethyl chloride impurity
(B) Diethyl ether peroxide (explosive) forms by radical chain autoxidation of α-C–H bonds; must test with starch-iodide paper before use
(C) Diethyl ether polymerises to form a polymer
(D) Ether absorbs water and becomes corrosive
CH₃MgI + HCHO (formaldehyde) → H₃O⁺ → ?
(A) Dimethyl ether (CH₃OCH₃)
(B) Ethanol (CH₃CH₂OH; primary alcohol; Grignard adds 1C to HCHO)
(C) Acetaldehyde (CH₃CHO)
(D) Methanol (CH₃OH)
TsCl / pyridine converts (R)-2-butanol to (R)-2-butyl tosylate. The configuration at C2 in the tosylate is:
(A) Inverted to (S); SN2 occurred at C2
(B) Retained as (R); TsCl reacts at S (sulfur of tosyl), not at C2; C–O bond of alcohol is NOT broken; configuration at C2 unchanged
(C) Racemised; radical mechanism at C2
(D) (R) to (S) because pyridine drives inversion
2 ROH → R–O–R + H₂O occurs with conc. H₂SO₄ at 140°C for 1° alcohols. The mechanism is:
(A) SN1: 1° alcohol ionises to 1° carbocation; second alcohol attacks
(B) SN2: protonated alcohol (oxonium ion) undergoes SN2 by a second alcohol molecule as nucleophile at the primary C; 1° substrates only
(C) E2: both alcohols eliminate water simultaneously
(D) Radical coupling under acidic conditions
The Wittig reaction uses Ph₃P=CHR (ylide). The ylide is prepared from:
(A) Ph₃PH + RCHBr (radical)
(B) Ph₃P + RCHBr₂ → phosphonium salt; then base → ylide (SN2 at C then α-deprotonation)
(C) Ph₃P + RCH₂OH (alcohol)
(D) Ph₃P + RCHO (aldehyde reacts directly)
Epoxide + LiAlH₄ opens at:
(A) The more substituted carbon (SN1-like)
(B) The less hindered (less substituted) carbon via SN2; H⁻ attacks least hindered C; inversion at that carbon
(C) Both carbons equally (racemic mixture)
(D) The carbon bearing the oxygen (O attacked, not C)
SOCl₂ (no base, inert solvent) converts (R)-2-butanol to 2-chlorobutane by SNi. The product has:
(A) Inversion → (S)-2-chlorobutane
(B) Retention → (R)-2-chlorobutane (Cl delivered from same face via cyclic 4-centre TS)
(C) Racemisation
(D) No stereoselectivity
PhMgBr reacts with acetone → H₃O⁺. The product is:
(A) PhCHO (aldehyde; no — Grignard reduces not oxidises)
(B) 2-Phenyl-2-propanol (Ph–C(OH)(CH₃)₂; 3° alcohol; Ph adds to ketone C=O)
(C) Diphenylmethanol (requires benzophenone)
(D) Phenol + acetone (decomposition)
The Corey-House synthesis uses R₂CuLi (Gilman reagent) + R'X to give:
(A) R–OH (alcohol)
(B) R–R' (new C–C bond; SN2 by soft cuprate on soft alkyl halide; no elimination)
(C) R–X + R'–X (halogen exchange)
(D) R–O–R' (ether)
Which alcohol gives a ketone on oxidation with K₂Cr₂O₇/H₂SO₄?
(A) Ethanol (primary → gives acid eventually)
(B) 2-Propanol (secondary → acetone, a ketone)
(C) 2-Methyl-2-propanol (tertiary → no oxidation; no α-H to C=O)
(D) Methanol (primary → gives formic acid)
The reaction: 2 R–X + 2Na → R–R + 2NaX (Wurtz reaction). The best substrates are:
(A) 3° alkyl halides (most stable cation for radical)
(B) Primary alkyl halides (least steric; radical/ionic; gives good yield of symmetrical alkane)
(C) Aryl halides (most reactive)
(D) Tertiary halides give Wurtz exclusively
PhMgBr + D₂O → ? This reaction occurs because:
(A) D₂O oxidises PhMgBr
(B) PhMgBr is a strong base (pKa of Ph–H~43); D₂O (pKa~15.7) is far more acidic; proton (deuteron) transfer gives Ph–D + MgBr(OD); protonolysis
(C) D₂O adds across the phenyl ring (1,4-addition)
(D) No reaction; PhMgBr is stable in D₂O
Dehydration of (CH₃)₃COH with H₂SO₄ at 170°C gives 2-methylpropene (isobutylene). The mechanism is:
(A) E2 — H₂SO₄ acts as a base
(B) E1 — protonation of OH → oxonium ion → H₂O leaves → 3° carbocation → proton lost to solvent → alkene
(C) SNi — internal migration
(D) E1cb — carbanion at α-C
EtMgBr + CH₃CN → H₃O⁺ → The main product is:
(A) Pentan-3-ol (wrong; two Grignards needed)
(B) Pentan-3-one? No — EtMgBr + CH₃CN → CH₃C(=NMgBr)Et → H₃O⁺ → methyl ethyl ketone (CH₃COC₂H₅) via imine hydrolysis
(C) Butanenitrile (no reaction)
(D) Ethylamine + acetic acid
The acidity of alcohols (pKa~16) is LESS than water (pKa~15.7). The reason alkyl groups decrease acidity is:
(A) Alkyl groups are electron withdrawing, destabilising the alkoxide
(B) Alkyl groups donate electrons (+I) to oxygen, increasing electron density on O and destabilising the alkoxide anion; water has H (least donating) so H₂O is slightly more acidic than ROH
(C) Alkyl groups block proton removal sterically
(D) Alkoxide is aromatic and hence more stable than hydroxide
Epoxide + HBr (acid conditions): which carbon does Br⁻ attack in 2-methyl-1,2-epoxypropane?
(A) C1 (less substituted) via SN2 (acidic conditions)
(B) C2 (more substituted, tertiary) — acid protonates O → more carbocation character at tertiary C2; Br⁻ attacks the more substituted C (Markovnikov-like; SN1 character)
(C) Equal attack at both C1 and C2
(D) Oxygen is attacked, not carbon
The Swern oxidation (oxalyl chloride + DMSO + Et₃N) converts 1° alcohol to aldehyde. Et₃N acts as:
(A) The oxidant (Et₃N oxidises the alcohol)
(B) A base that abstracts the α-H from the alkoxysulfonium intermediate, triggering elimination to give the aldehyde (and dimethyl sulfide)
(C) A solvent in the Swern reaction
(D) A catalyst for DMSO activation only
In the Mitsunobu reaction (PPh₃ + DIAD + RCOOH + R'OH), the stereochemical outcome at R'OH is:
(A) Retention (PPh₃ assists front-face delivery)
(B) Inversion (SN2 — carboxylate attacks the activated oxyphosphonium from backside); this is how Mitsunobu inverts alcohols
(C) Racemisation via radical
(D) Retention only when DIAD is absent
R–X + AgNO₂ (silver nitrite) → R–ONO (nitrite ester). R–X + KNO₂ → R–NO₂ (nitroalkane). The difference is because:
(A) Ag⁺ oxidises the alkyl group
(B) AgNO₂: Ag⁺ coordinates at N, forcing O-end to attack (O is the nucleophile in tight ion pair); KNO₂ in polar aprotic: free NO₂⁻, softer C-end attacks (harder C–N bond forms); ambident nucleophile regiochemistry controlled by cation and solvent
(C) KNO₂ is basic enough to cause E2
(D) Ag⁺ reduces NO₂⁻ to NO which reacts differently
The Fischer esterification is an equilibrium. Which condition maximally shifts it toward ester?
(A) Use of a base to neutralise the acid product
(B) Large excess of alcohol OR azeotropic removal of water (Dean-Stark trap with benzene or toluene); both remove product from equilibrium; H₂SO₄ catalyses but cannot shift equilibrium alone
(C) Use of NaHCO₃ to buffer the acid
(D) High pressure drives the reaction; temperature has no effect on yield
Ethyl ether (diethyl ether) + HI → ? The products and mechanism are:
(A) Diethyl iodide + water (two carbons iodinated)
(B) CH₃CH₂OH + CH₃CH₂I (one equivalent HI); I⁻ (soft, good SN2 nucleophile) attacks less hindered C of protonated ether; mechanism: protonation of O → SN2 by I⁻ → ethanol + ethyl iodide
(C) CH₄ + CH₃I + H₂O (complete fragmentation)
(D) Diethyl peroxide + HI (redox reaction)
R–Br + Mg (dry ether) → RMgBr. If moist ether is used:
(A) The Grignard reagent is still formed but more slowly
(B) Water reacts with RMgBr as it forms (protonolysis): RMgBr + H₂O → R–H + Mg(OH)Br; no Grignard accumulates; reaction fails
(C) MgBr₂ precipitates out and cannot react
(D) Water catalyses Grignard formation
Which sequence correctly gives a 3° alcohol from benzaldehyde (PhCHO)?
(A) PhCHO + 2 CH₃MgBr → H₃O⁺ → Ph–C(CH₃)₂OH? No — 2nd Grignard cannot add after 1st addition to aldehyde gives 2° alcohol; only 1 Grignard adds to aldehyde
(B) PhCHO + 1 CH₃MgBr → H₃O⁺ → PhCH(OH)CH₃ (2° alcohol); to get 3°: use ketone e.g. PhCHO oxidised to PhCOCH₃ then + CH₃MgBr → Ph–C(CH₃)₂–OH (3°)
(C) PhCHO + CH₃MgBr → then + another Grignard → 3° via ester intermediate
(D) PhCHO + 2 equivalents of PhMgBr → triphenylmethanol (3° alcohol) — NOT possible with PhCHO; need PhCOPh (benzophenone)
In the Oppenauer oxidation (Al(OiPr)₃ + acetone as H-acceptor), secondary alcohol → ketone. This is the reverse of:
(A) Swern oxidation
(B) Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley (MPV) reduction — same Al-mediated 6-membered cyclic TS; H transfers from iPrOH to ketone in MPV; reversed here (H from substrate to acetone)
(C) Baeyer-Villiger oxidation
(D) Wacker oxidation
2 Na + 2 EtOH → 2 EtONa + H₂↑. If the same experiment is done with t-BuOH, the reaction is SLOWER despite t-BuOH having a higher pKa (weaker acid). The rate difference is because:
(A) t-BuOH has a lower pKa so reacts faster
(B) The rate of reaction with Na is KINETIC (access of Na surface to O–H); steric bulk of t-Bu slows approach to Na surface; EtOH less hindered, faster. Thermodynamic acidity (pKa) and kinetic rate are independent for heterogeneous reactions
(C) t-BuONa is more soluble in t-BuOH, retarding the reaction
(D) Na reduces t-BuOH to t-butane
CH₃Br + KCN (DMSO) → CH₃CN (nitrile, major product). CH₃Br + AgCN → CH₃NC (isocyanide, major). The difference arises because:
(A) DMSO converts KCN to KNC
(B) In DMSO, CN⁻ is a free ion; softer C-end attacks soft CH₃Br (SN2, soft-soft); AgCN forms tight covalent Ag–N bond at N, forcing the C-end of CN away, and O-end (now N-end) cannot attack — actually Ag coordinates at N(?) — correction: Ag coordinates at C, forcing N-end attack in ion pair → isocyanide
(C) Temperature determines C vs N attack
(D) Methyl iodide is needed for isocyanide; bromide gives nitrile in all conditions
Which correctly describes the product of dehydration of 2-butanol with H₂SO₄ at 170°C?
(A) But-1-ene (less substituted; Hofmann product)
(B) But-2-ene (major; Zaitsev; more substituted alkene from E1 via 2° carbocation — partial 1,2-H shift also gives but-2-ene dominantly)
(C) Dibutyl ether (intermolecular; wrong temperature)
(D) Butan-2-one (ketone; wrong reaction type)
The Ullmann reaction (2 ArBr + Cu → Ar–Ar + CuBr₂) is used for:
(A) Aliphatic C–C bond formation
(B) Synthesis of biaryls (Ar–Ar); Cu couples two aryl halides by radical mechanism; 1° alkyl halides cannot be used
(C) Reduction of aryl halides to arenes
(D) Formation of aryl ethers from two aryl halides
In the Williamson synthesis, to make ethyl isopropyl ether (CH₃CH₂–O–CH(CH₃)₂), the correct combination is:
(A) CH₃CH₂O⁻ + (CH₃)₂CHBr [2° halide; SN2 possible; some E2 may occur]
(B) (CH₃)₂CHO⁻ + CH₃CH₂Br [1° ethyl bromide + isopropoxide; best yield; SN2 on 1° with no E2 competition]
(C) (CH₃)₂CHCl + CH₃CH₂ONa [2° chloride; more E2]
(D) (CH₃)₂CHBr + CH₃CH₂ONa [2° bromide; more E2 competition than 1°]
Reduction of epoxide of cyclohexene (1,2-epoxycyclohexane) with LiAlH₄ gives trans-cyclohexanol (only one OH but racemate). The trans product arises because:
(A) H⁻ adds syn to the epoxide oxygen
(B) H⁻ (hydride) attacks the less hindered carbon of the epoxide from the back (SN2); inversion at the carbon attacked; since both C1 and C2 are equivalent in cyclohexene oxide, attack at either gives trans-cyclohexan-1-ol (racemic) — actually only one alcohol product since only one C–O cleaved
(C) The ring opens without any stereospecificity
(D) LiAlH₄ first reduces epoxide O to OH by direct protonation
RMgX + R'CHO → H₃O⁺ gives a secondary alcohol. Which Grignard-aldehyde combination gives 2-pentanol?
(A) EtMgBr + propionaldehyde (CH₃CH₂CHO) → 3-pentanol (not 2-pentanol)
(B) CH₃MgBr + butyraldehyde (CH₃CH₂CH₂CHO) → CH₃CH₂CH₂CH(OH)CH₃ = 2-pentanol ✓ (methyl Grignard + C4 aldehyde)
(C) n-PrMgBr + HCHO → butan-1-ol (primary)
(D) n-BuMgBr + HCHO → pentan-1-ol (primary)
PhOH + NaOH → PhO⁻Na⁺ + H₂O. PhO⁻ + CH₃Br → PhOCH₃ (anisole). But PhO⁻ + (CH₃)₃CBr gives mostly isobutylene + PhOH. This is because:
(A) PhO⁻ is a soft nucleophile; 3° halides are soft electrophiles
(B) (CH₃)₃CBr is a 3° halide; PhO⁻ acts as a base (E2) abstracting β-H from the 3° substrate; elimination dominates over substitution; CH₃Br (primary) → SN2 dominates
(C) PhO⁻ is too large to attack (CH₃)₃CBr
(D) PhO⁻ reacts with (CH₃)₃CBr by SN1; PhO⁻ attacks the formed t-Bu cation
Pinacol coupling (2 acetone + Mg/Hg → pinacol) gives 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol. This is a:
(A) SN2 reaction between two acetone molecules
(B) Reductive coupling of two carbonyl compounds via ketyl radicals (C=O + e⁻ → •C–O⁻); two radicals combine at C; gives vicinal diol (1,2-diol)
(C) Aldol condensation under acidic conditions
(D) E2 elimination from a diacetone compound
The acylation of an alcohol (R–OH) with acetic anhydride (Ac₂O) in pyridine gives an ester. Pyridine's role is:
(A) Pyridine is the nucleophile that attacks Ac₂O; acylpyridinium forms; alcohol then attacks the activated acylpyridinium (better electrophile) → ester + pyridine regenerated
(B) Pyridine is just a solvent
(C) Pyridine deprotonates the alcohol to make a more reactive alkoxide
(D) Pyridine reacts with acetic acid by-product preventing reverse reaction only
| Q | Ans | Q | Ans | Q | Ans | Q | Ans | Q | Ans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C | 11 | B | 21 | B | 31 | B | 41 | B |
| 2 | B | 12 | C | 22 | B | 32 | B | 42 | B |
| 3 | B | 13 | C | 23 | B | 33 | B | 43 | B |
| 4 | C | 14 | B | 24 | B | 34 | B | 44 | B |
| 5 | B | 15 | B | 25 | B | 35 | B | 45 | B |
| 6 | B | 16 | B | 26 | B | 36 | B | 46 | B |
| 7 | B | 17 | B | 27 | B | 37 | B | 47 | B |
| 8 | B | 18 | B | 28 | B | 38 | B | 48 | B |
| 9 | B | 19 | B | 29 | B | 39 | B | 49 | B |
| 10 | B | 20 | B | 30 | B | 40 | B | 50 | A |